Recently I heard about some local gaming issues where a group has a member, who while usually a nice guy, can loose his temper, throw dice and generally makes things unpleasant for the others.
Advice was sought because the organizer did not want to get rid of the player because "he spends alot of money in the local store and supports local conventions". Wanting to make things better is admirable, especially if you like someone and want to save the group but to start off by citing money spent as the major factor in not offending an offender? Am I right to find that off-putting?
Are things so bad that we have to tolerate poor sportsmanship to keep a few dollars? Would I be considered less important as an asset if I played fairly but had less money to spend? What about the others who have a tainted experience because of one bad apple? What if the bad apple starts to spread his bad habits to others?
How you would handle a poorly tempered player?
Just curious.